In 2013, Audrey Jarvis, a 19-year-old student at Sonoma State University and a devout Catholic, was working for the university’s Associated Students Production (“ASP”) organization at a student orientation fair. At the event, her supervisor asked her to remove her cross necklace.
The supervisor told Audrey that the chancellor had a policy against wearing religious items and said the cross necklace “might offend others, it might make incoming students feel unwelcome, or it might cause incoming students to feel that ASP was not an organization they should join.”
The supervisor approached Audrey a second time and told her to put the cross under her shirt or remove it. Audrey was so upset by the incident that she left the student orientation fair early.
With the assistance of First Liberty attorneys, Audrey filed a religious accommodation request with the university.
Sonoma State University spokeswoman Susan Kashack admitted to Fox News that the incident did occur and that the supervisor was “completely wrong” in his actions.
School officials did the right thing and launched an investigation into the incident. In July 2013, the president of Sonoma State University issued a formal apology to Audrey.
First Liberty is seeing more and more cases of anti-religious discrimination throughout America’s schools. Secularist groups like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) have created a culture of fear in many of America’s public schools. From elementary schools to large universities, some officials are so afraid of potential lawsuits that they violate the constitutional rights of students and staff to freely express their faith.
The U.S. Constitution and well established legal precedent guarantee strong religious liberty protections for students and school staff—and these rights do not stop at the “schoolhouse gate” (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 1969). Audrey Jarvis’s case shows that when people of faith take a stand and receive expert legal help, hostility to religious expression can be defeated and religious liberty protected..
First Liberty Institute is not currently providing additional content for this case. Please see the other tabs in this case for more information.
First Liberty Institute is not currently providing additional content for this case. Please see the other tabs in this case for more information.