3 Recent Leadership Picks for Military and HHS are Bad News for Religious Freedom

April 9, 2021
Sec 2 Recent Picks 1200x630

by Liberty McArtor • 6 min read

Three new high-level appointments in the U.S. government should concern all Americans who value religious liberty. Upon a deeper review of these individuals’ backgrounds, our team of experts uncovered troubling actions and statements with regard to our First Freedom.

Americans should remain vigilant as Xavier Becerra and Rachel Levine assume leadership positions at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and as Richard Torres-Estrada takes charge as the Chief of Diversity and Inclusion of the U.S. Military Special Operations Command (USSOCOM).

The Military’s Newest “Woke Brigade”?

Allegedly hired to foster diversity and inclusion among the U.S. Military’s most elite forces (like the Navy SEALs, Delta Force, Army Rangers, and others), Torres-Estrada’s past displays of stark partisanship are particularly concerning.

In fact, the Department of Defense is currently investigating Torres-Estrada concerning inflammatory social media posts suggesting a disdain for conservative figures, including one that compared former President Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler.

As it relates to religious freedom, there’s expressed concern that his partisanship and hostile views could result in adverse treatment of service members with religious beliefs.

Torres-Estrada’s past comments are even more alarming considering recent trends of religious hostility in the upper echelons of the military. Often, these trends masquerade as good efforts—such as ridding the military of “extremism” or increasing “inclusion.”

The problem? Service members with traditional religious beliefs are often targeted, excluded—”canceled.”

Take for example Jay Lorenzen, an Air Force Veteran invited to speak to JAG reservists last summer. His appearance was swiftly canceled after ridiculous complaints that his Christian beliefs amounted to an “unconstitutional disgrace.”

“We need men and women of all ethnicities and races, along with a diversity of backgrounds and beliefs in our formation,” Gen. Richard Clarke, SOCOM commander, said recently.

Echoing Gen. Clarke’s statement, First Liberty’s General Counsel Mike Berry recently testified before the U.S. House Armed Services Committee on the issue of extremism in the military.

Mike explained that under a broad definition of “extremism,” some factions in military leadership have previously targeted service members because of their faith:

“A truly diverse military means one that is open and welcoming to all who meet the standards for service. It also means a rejection of any attempt to weaponize anti- extremism in order to target a religious belief or worldview of which those in authority disapprove.”

Promoting “diversity and inclusion” in the special forces is a noble and well-intentioned goal. However, if leaders like Torres-Estrada allow partisanship or popularity to dictate military policy, then it will cause grave harm to the First Amendment freedoms of service members.

Fli Insider 4 Eli Filibuster Ipad Banner

Xavier Becerra: A Proven Threat to Religious Liberty

Newly confirmed to lead HHS, Xavier Becerra has done more than make worrying comments. He’s demonstrated his animosity toward faithful Americans by pursuing vicious attacks on religious free exercise.

Here are some examples of Becerra’s campaign against religious freedom, from his time as California’s Attorney General:

  • He defended California’s FACT Act, which required all health care entities to refer for abortions. When certain entities (like faith-based pregnancy centers) did not comply, they were fined up to $1,000. Thankfully, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down California’s FACT Act.
  • He sued the Little Sisters of the Poor after the organization of nuns had already won a similar battle at the Supreme Court. With his lawsuit, he attempted to force the nuns to provide contraception for their employees, even though doing so would violate their religious beliefs.
  • He defended a law that required California churches to pay for elective abortion coverage, even after the HHS Conscious and Religious Freedom Division issued a notice that the law violated religious liberty protections.

“Xavier Becerra is a dangerous ideologue who has made a career of attacking long-held religious freedom protections and using his office to pursue a partisan political agenda,” said Justin Butterfield, FLI Deputy General Counsel, who previously served as the Senior Advisor for Conscience and Religious Freedom at HHS.

Levine: A Mission to Disband Healthcare Religious Freedom Protections

Working under Becerra will be Rachel Levine, recently confirmed as Assistant Secretary of Health at HHS.

Levine’s past statements indicate a personal mission to eradicate religious liberty protections for healthcare workers and faith-based organizations.

In what would be an extremely dangerous move for religious liberty, Levine suggested disbanding the HHS’s Office of Conscience and Religious Freedom Division (OCRFD), formed under the Trump administration to protect faith-based healthcare institutions and conscience rights of all who work in healthcare.

Levine also called it “immoral and unethical” to allow for religious exemptions to the Affordable Care Act’s (Obamacare) contraceptive mandate. In other words, it’s likely that if Levine were to have a hand in the matter, organizations such as the Little Sisters of the Poor would be forced to pay for contraception even though it violates their beliefs.

Levine’s department could have a major role in implementing policy if the so-called “Equality” Act were signed into law. As our legal team explained previously, the “Equality” Act is legislative proposal that’s disastrous for religious freedom.

Stay Informed, Stay Vigilant

First Liberty is committed to providing analysis on nominees, appointments and legislation that directly impact your religious liberty. It’s vital to know who’s leading our country, and our legal team will continue to expose those in positions of power whose records, background and statements don’t reflect a respect for our First Freedom.

Sec 2these Are The One Banner V2

Social Facebook Social Instagram Twitter X Icon | First Liberty Institute Social Youtube Social Linkedin

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyState DisclosuresSitemap • © 2024 Liberty Institute® is a trademark of First Liberty Institute