Bethesda University, located in Anaheim, California, is a private accredited Christian school founded in 1976 and approved by the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education of the State of California. From the beginning, the university was founded on Pentecostal theology which shapes the mission and educational goals of the school.
In early 2022, an internal dispute arose among the school’s board of directors. The president of the university wanted several board positions to be filled by non-Pentecostal members. He therefore deceived the school’s board into appointing these non-Pentecostal members under the guise that doing so was necessary for the school to retain its accreditation. The rest of Bethesda’s leadership later objected, concerned that Bethesda’s very identity as a Pentecostal institution was at stake, because its board retains ultimate power to determine the religious principles and policies governing every aspect of its operations and instruction. Ultimately, the board dismissed the president from his position. He then filed a lawsuit, and a California trial court conducted a hearing under the Corporations Code to determine which group of board members should lead Bethesda.
The California Court of Appeal held that this Pentecostal organization’s foundational documents permit non-Pentecostsals to occupy some of the highest leadership positions despite the school’s religious requirements for those positions. The court waded—or perhaps more accurately dove headfirst—into the forbidden waters of adjudicating on religious doctrine. The court claimed to apply “neutral principles” to choose one side over the other, but it nevertheless determined the leadership and doctrinal direction of a religious institution. This decision improperly entangled the court in religious controversy in violation of the First Amendment. The decision also ignored constitutional doctrines that should have enabled the court to avoid such entanglement.
“How religious organizations choose to operate is a sacred right protected by the First Amendment,” said First Liberty Institute Senior Counsel, Jeremy Dys. “Religious institutions have the right to freely choose who will preach their beliefs, teach their faith, carry out their mission, or lead their organization without courts interfering.”
This is an important case for all religious organizations. Secular courts are categorically prohibited by the First Amendment from involving themselves in the mission of religious organizations. If a court can evaluate the religious character of Bethesda University, it can also tell the local church who it must hire to preach their beliefs and allow outsiders to direct the mission of the church, regardless if it is out of step with the religious doctrines of the church. The First Amendment has already struck that balance in favor of church autonomy.
The U.S. Supreme Court has long held that courts are barred from adjudicating church leadership disputes. Over 70 years ago in Kedroff v. St. Nicholas Cathedral of Russian Orthodox Church in North America, the Court stated that religious institutions have the fundamental right “to decide for themselves, free from state interference, matters of church government as well as those of faith and doctrine.”
In November, First Liberty Institute and Greenberg Traurig LLP submitted a petition to the Supreme Court of the United States, asking it to hear this case.
News Release
For Immediate Release: 11.11.24
Contact: John Manning, media@firstliberty.org
Direct: 972-941-4453
Supreme Court Asked to Protect Right of Religious Organizations to Operate Without Government Interference
First Liberty Institute petitions the Supreme Court in key religious liberty case with implications for all faith-based organizations.
Washington, DC—Attorneys for First Liberty Institute and Greenberg Traurig LLP today asked the Supreme Court of the United States to reverse a lower court decision that forced Bethesda University to include board members who do not follow their firmly held, religious beliefs.
You can read the petition here.
“How religious organizations choose to operate is a sacred right protected by the First Amendment,” said Jeremy Dys, Senior Counsel for First Liberty Institute. “Secular courts are not competent to evaluate the religious character of religious organizations. The U.S. Supreme Court has made it clear that the Constitution protects the independence of religious organizations to choose their own leaders, and we ask it to do so once again in this case.”
“There should be no doubt that religious institutions—not judges—choose how to fulfill their religious missions,” said Dominic Draye, co-chair of the appellate practice at Greenberg Traurig LLP. “The First Amendment prohibits the government from interfering with the autonomy of religious organizations and entangling itself in religious disputes.”
Bethesda University is a Pentecostal institution that requires its Board members to share its religious faith and to act consistently with its Pentecostal beliefs. Consistent with these requirements, Bethesda removed purported Board members who were not Pentecostal. Nonetheless, a California state court claimed it could apply “neutral principles” to determine the religious qualifications for the university’s board, thus allowing one religious faction to usurp control over the other. In 1871, in the case of Watson v. Jones, the Supreme Court said that it would, “lead to the total subversion of . . . religious bodies if any one aggrieved by one of their decisions could appeal to the secular courts and have them reversed.”
In the petition, Bethesda’s attorneys argue that lower courts require clarification from the Supreme Court on the circumstances requiring so-called “ecclesiastical abstention.” Some courts abstain from all but property disputes, which is the traditional rule, while others wade into controversies—like Bethesda’s—that involve a determination of religious membership or good standing. The petition explains that the latter approach “places a great many religious institutions at risk of judicial intrusion into matters theological.”
###
About First Liberty Institute
First Liberty Institute is a non-profit public interest law firm and the largest legal organization in the nation dedicated exclusively to defending religious freedom for all Americans.
To arrange an interview, contact John Manning at media@firstliberty.org or by calling 972-941-4453.