Chaplain Scott Squires | Cases | First Liberty

DISCIPLINED FOR FOLLOWING THE RULES

No chaplain should be punished for following the rules. But Chaplain Scott Squires, who has served his country for 25 years, first as an enlisted soldier, and now as a Chaplain in the United States Army, faced the specter of a court martial for following the rules of his denomination and military policy. Meanwhile, SSG Kacie Griffin, chaplain assistant to CH Squires, lost her place in the highly selective, “Green to Gold” ROTC program. Why? When a same-sex couple registered for a marriage retreat CH Squires was scheduled to facilitate, he was prevented from leading the retreat by the rules of his endorsing agency, the North American Mission Board (NAMB) of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC). SSG Griffin merely communicated information to CH Squires.

A Chaplain Who Follows the Rules

The North American Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention endorses CH Squires. Without that endorsement, he cannot serve as an Army chaplain. NAMB, following SBC doctrine, does not permit their Chaplains to facilitate marriage retreats that include same sex couples. Doing so would violate the Southern Baptist Church’s beliefs on the institution of marriage and could result in a chaplain losing his endorsement. Army regulations also require Chaplains to adhere to their endorsing agency’s rules and religious tenets. Thankfully, the Army has a policy that requires those chaplains who are constrained by their endorsing agency to remove themselves from such retreats and allow another chaplain to facilitate the retreat.

When his assistant, SSG Kacie Griffin, informed CH Squires that a soldier in a same sex marriage wanted to attend a marriage seminar, CH Squires took the appropriate action required by his church and the Army. CH Squires immediately consulted with his direct command and then worked quickly to personally ensure the soldier was included in the next seminar being conducted by a Chaplain without restrictions. For reasons unknown, the soldier never attended the rescheduled retreat.

When the soldier filed a complaint, the Army launched an investigation into Squires’ actions, which eventually landed on the desk of Major General Kurt Sonntag. An Army investigator recommended that SSG Griffin be reprimanded for her purely administrative act. Her immediate supervisor cleared SSG Griffin of those charges, but when the complainant appealed that decision to MG Sonntag, SSG Griffin lost her eligibility for the Army’s “Green to Gold” program in which enlisted soldiers are competitively selected to attend college and become commissioned officers because MG Sonntag deliberately refused to decide the appeal.

After First Liberty submitted its rebuttal identifying significant legal and factual errors with the initial investigation report, MG Sonntag directed the same investigator to continue investigating and to submit a new report. After further investigation, that investigator recently recommended that CH Squires be found guilty of “dereliction of duty” for taking just three business days to reschedule a marriage retreat he was prohibited from facilitating to ensure the couple could attend. Such a recommendation could have lead to a court martial for CH Squires and time in a military prison.

The new report, however, either intentionally or negligently overlooked evidence from the investigation clearing Chaplain Squires of any wrongdoing. The investigator claimed Squires didn’t discuss the situation with his superior officer before taking action to reschedule the marriage retreat, but his senior chaplain told the investigator that he did discuss the situation. Not only that, the chaplain that replaced Squires on the retreat told the Army investigator, “He was responsible in his duties the entire time as I see it.” Despite this clear evidence, the Army investigator concluded that Chaplain Squires should be charged with “dereliction of duty.” Read our response here.

First Liberty Institute successfully defended CH Squires’ religious liberty and military career.

Read First Liberty’s letter to the Secretary of Army here.

FIRST LIBERTY TAKES ACTION

Under federal law and Department of Defense regulations, the military may not take adverse action against a chaplain who acts in accordance with his or her religious tenets. First Liberty sent multiple letters to the U.S. Army urging it to reverse the investigator’s decision and the recommendation that Squires and Griffin be disciplined.

“The United States Army, acting under the command of Major General Sonntag, was threatening to punish one of its chaplains because he followed the rules,” said Mike Berry, Deputy General Counsel and Director of Military Affairs to First Liberty. “No chaplain should face the specter of a court martial and military prison for following the rules of their faith and the Army. We’re grateful to the U.S. Army for reversing course, respecting the religious liberty of its soldiers and restoring both Squires and Griffin’s careers.”

Read the Army’s report recommending CH Squires be charged with “dereliction of duty” and First Liberty’s response urging that the recommendation be rejected.

Press Release
For Immediate Release: August 24, 2018
Contact: Lacey McNiel, media@firstliberty.org
Direct: 972-941-4453

Religious Liberty Prevails: U.S. Army Official Clears Chaplain and Assistant of Outrageous “Dereliction of Duty” Charge

General invalidates recommendations to punish chaplain who followed military regulations


Ft. Bragg, N.C.—Today, the United States Army announced that it has rejected the findings of an investigation, and will abandon charges of “dereliction of duty” against First Liberty Institute clients Chaplain Scott Squires and Chaplain Assistant, SSG Kacie Griffin. An earlier Army report recommended Squires be disciplined for following the rules of the Army and taking three business days to reschedule a marriage retreat he was prohibited by his denomination from facilitating.

“We are grateful that the Army has rejected and abandoned these baseless charges,” said Mike Berry, Deputy General Counsel and Director of Military Affairs to First Liberty. “The United States military is no place for anti-religious hostility against its own military chaplains. Chaplains like Scott Squires assistant Kacie Griffin do not have to give up their First Amendment rights in order to serve their fellow soldiers.”

The complaint that triggered an investigation of Chaplain Squires alleged that he discriminated against a same-sex couple when he quickly rescheduled a marriage retreat his chaplain endorsing agency, the North American Mission Board (NAMB) of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC), prevents its chaplains from facilitating. Despite Department of Defense (DOD) regulations that require chaplains to adhere to their endorsers’ rules and religious tenets and overlooking statements clearing Chaplain Squires of any wrongdoing, an Army investigator recommended that Squires be found guilty of “dereliction of duty,” a court martial offense that could have resulted in up to six months in military prison.

“I look forward to being able to focus on continuing my career serving my fellow soldiers,” said Chaplain Squires. “I am eternally grateful to First Liberty for covering my six and fighting to restore my religious liberty.”

To download a copy of this press release, click here.

###

About First Liberty Institute

First Liberty Institute is a non-profit public interest law firm and the largest legal organization in the nation dedicated exclusively to defending religious freedom for all Americans.

To arrange an interview, contact Lacey McNiel at media@firstliberty.org or by calling 972-941-4453.


Press Releases

First Liberty Press Release – 08/06/18

First Liberty Press Release – 08/01/18

Photos

Chaplain Scott Squires

The use of this photo does not imply DOD endorsement.

Chaplain Scott Squires

First Liberty Logo - Restoring Religious Liberty for All Americans

To The American Legion:

As a grateful citizen, I support your effort to honor those who have fallen in battle and to keep the Bladensburg WWI Veterans Memorial standing as a visible reminder of valor, sacrifice, endurance, and devotion.

Veterans memorials like the one in Bladensburg, MD are symbols reminding us of the sacrifice of our service members and the cost of war. Tearing down the Bladensburg Memorial would erase the memory of the 49 fallen heroes of Prince George’s County—like they never even existed.

We cannot allow the Bladensburg Memorial to be bulldozed.

Please know that you have my support and backing in your petition to the U.S. Supreme Court.